United States v. Kwai Fun Wong

United States v. Kwai Fun Wong
Decided April 22, 2015
Full case nameUnited States v. Kwai Fun Wong
Citations575 U.S. 402 (more)
Holding
The statutes of limitations within the Federal Tort Claims Act are subject to equitable tolling because they have not been expressly tagged by Congress as jurisdictional.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan

United States v. Kwai Fun Wong, 575 U.S. 402 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that the statutes of limitations within the Federal Tort Claims Act are subject to equitable tolling because they have not been expressly tagged by Congress as jurisdictional.[1][2]

Background

The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) provides that a tort claim against the United States "shall be forever barred" unless the claimant meets two deadlines. First, a claim must be presented to the appropriate federal agency for administrative review "within two years after [the] claim accrues." Second, if the agency denies the claim, the claimant may file suit in federal court "within six months" of the agency's denial.[1]

Kwai Fun Wong and Marlene June, respondents in Nos. 13–1074 and 13-1075, respectively, each missed one of those deadlines. Wong failed to file her FTCA claim in federal court within six months, but argued that that was only because the federal district court had not permitted her to file that claim until after the period expired. June failed to present her FTCA claim to a federal agency within two years, but argued that her untimely filing should be excused because the government had, in her view, concealed facts vital to her claim. In each case, the district court dismissed the FTCA claim for failure to satisfy the statutes of limitations, holding that, despite any justification for delay, those time bars are jurisdictional and not subject to equitable tolling. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed in both cases, concluding that the statutes of limitations may be equitably tolled.[1]

Opinion of the court

The Supreme Court issued an opinion on April 22, 2015.[1]

Subsequent developments

References

  1. ^ a b c d United States v. Kwai Fun Wong, 575 U.S. 402 (2015).
  2. ^ Wasserman, Howard M. (April 23, 2015). "Opinion analysis: Clear statements, sovereign immunity, and timeliness". SCOTUSblog. Retrieved August 4, 2025.

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.