Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights
Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights provides a right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion. This includes the freedom to change a religion or belief, and to manifest a religion or belief in worship, teaching, practice and observance, subject to certain restrictions that are "in accordance with law" and "necessary in a democratic society".
Article text
Article 9 – Freedom of thought, conscience and religion
- Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change her/his religion or belief and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest her/his religion or belief, in worship, teaching, practice and observance.
- Freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs shall be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of public order, health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.
History
- Cuius regio, eius religio was a principle of European international law, beginning in the 16th century in the wake of the Protestant reformation, that established freedom of religion for states, but not individuals.
- The First Amendment to the United States Constitution was one of the first legal protections for freedom of religion without reference to any specific religion.
- Article X of the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, which influenced the European Convention, declares freedom of religious opinion as a universal right.
Case law
- European Court of Human Rights:
- Buscarini and Others v. San Marino (requirement of religious oaths for public office not permitted)
- Kokkinakis v. Greece (criminalization of proselytism, as defined in Greek law, permitted)
- Leyla Şahin v. Turkey (university ban on Islamic headscarf permitted)
- Pichon and Sajous v. France (no right to refuse supply of contraceptives on religious grounds)
- Leela Förderkreis E.V. and Others v. Germany (regarding state information campaigns about a religious movement)
- Universelles Leben e.V. v. Germany (regarding state information campaigns about a religious movement)
- Lautsi v. Italy (legal requirement to display a crucifix in school classrooms permitted)
- S.A.S. v. France (French ban on face coverings permitted)
- Osmanoğlu and Kocabaş v. Switzerland (permitted to require children to participate in mixed swimming lessons and enforce this through fines)
- Executief van de Moslims van België and Others v. Belgium (bans on ritual slaughter without prior stunning permitted)
- High Court of England and Wales:
- Connolly v DPP (no ground for appeal under Article 9 against conviction for sending indecent or grossly offensive material, namely images of aborted foetuses)
See also
Literature
- Murdoch J. Freedom of thought, conscience and religion. A guide to the implementation of Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights Strasbourg, Council of Europe, 2007
- Freedom of religion, a factsheet of ECtHR case law
- The Protections for Religious Rights: Law and Practice, a textbook on Article 9 and international law on the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion